You must have Javascript enabled to view this content.
...

Same, think of all the people over 500, that means there has to be almost an equal amount under 500, but I never see anyone with it.

Comment by eatyum
9/18/2019 11:36AM PDT

I, for the most part, seem to only play people hovering around .500. It seems even the guys who have played 300 games are even around .500. I guess this is one of those things where the more you play, the more you stay the same 🤔

9/18/2019 9:04PM PDT

That was me. I started the year with a 0-193 skid, but then I switched from a 4ms monitor to a 1ms monitor and now I’m on the upswing. 

Comment by SchnauzerFace
9/18/2019 11:05AM PDT

You’re still using public library wi-fi though, right?

9/18/2019 9:57PM PDT
...

You dont even play online according to what you said the other day lmao.

Comment by WolfgangSmith89
9/18/2019 7:49PM CDT

I said I don't play that much this year because I don't like the gameplay. I do play every once in awhile only because I like baseball as a sport. I'm not sure what my comment has to do with me playing? Your'e really a weird person. 

9/19/2019 5:43AM PDT
...

You’re still using public library wi-fi though, right?

Comment by MarinerMatt01
9/18/2019 9:57PM PDT

LOL imagine that

 

the amount of SHHHH's that you would be getting

 

there would be random books flying in the air out of rage

9/19/2019 8:20AM PDT

Unless you quit almost every game, there is no way you could be 6-123--you would win at least 20 games out of 130 just due to RNG/luck.

9/19/2019 9:42AM PDT

I think I can count on one hand how many people I have come across with a record under .500.  I guess if someone was 6-193 that would help balance it out a bit.

Comment by ChuckCLC
9/18/2019 11:33AM PDT

Definitely under 500 here. You're all welcome.

9/19/2019 1:41PM PDT

Join the conversation

Please login here to join the conversation.